A tailored-guided internet-based cognitive-behavioral intervention for patients with rheumatoid arthritis as an adjunct to standard rheumatological care: results of a randomized controlled trial.

For patients with chronic pain conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who experience elevated levels of distress, tailored-guided internet-based cognitive-behavioral treatment may be effective in improving psychological and physical functioning, and reducing the impact of RA on daily life. A multicenter, randomized controlled trial was conducted for RA patients with elevated levels of distress as assessed by a disease-specific measure. The control group (n = 71) received standard care and the intervention group (n = 62) additionally received an internet-based tailored cognitive-behavioral intervention. Main analyses were performed using a linear mixed model estimating differences between the intervention and control groups in scores of psychological functioning, physical functioning, and impact of RA on daily life at preassesment and postassessment, and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Patients who received the internet-based intervention reported a larger improvement in psychological functioning compared with the control group, indicating less depressed mood (P < 0.001, d = 0.54), negative mood (P = 0.01, d = 0.38), and anxiety (P < 0.001, d = 0.48) during the course of the 1-year follow-up period. Regarding physical functioning, a trend was found for the intervention group reporting less fatigue than the control group (P = 0.06, d = 0.24), whereas no effect was found on pain. No effects were found for the impact of RA on daily life, except for the intervention group experiencing fewer role limitations due to emotional problems (P < 0.001, d = 0.53). Offering guided internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy is a promising development to aid patients with psychological distress particularly in improving psychological functioning. Further research on adherence and specific intervention ingredients is warranted.

High-Dose Intravenous Pulse Methotrexate in Patients With Eosinophilic Fasciitis.

Importance: Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is a connective tissue disorder in which conventional treatment leads to disappointing results in a proportion of patients. Therefore, we investigated high-dose intravenous (IV) pulse methotrexate (MTX) as a treatment for EF. Objective: To examine safety and effects of monthly high-dose IV pulse MTX in EF. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this prospective single-arm study, we recruited 12 patients diagnosed with biopsy specimen-proven EF between 2006 and 2009 from the Department of Dermatology and Rheumatology at the Radboud University Medical Centre. Interventions: Intravenous MTX (4 mg/kg) monthly for 5 months with folinic acid rescue 24 hours after MTX administration. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was improvement of the modified skin score at month 5 vs baseline. Secondary outcomes were durometry, range of motion, visual analog scale scores for disease activity, and 36-Item Short Form Survey health questionnaires. Results: Overall, 12 patients (11 women between 37-69 years old) received a median (range) monthly dose of 288 (230-336) mg MTX. Median (range) modified skin score improved from 17.5 (8.0-24.0) at baseline to 8.5 (1.0-20.0) at month 5 (P = .001). Secondary outcome measures improved significantly, except for durometer scores and range of motion of the elbows. Adverse events included gastrointestinal symptoms (n = 9), mild stomatitis (n = 5), and alopecia (n = 4). Conclusions and Relevance: High-dose IV pulse MTX is a safe and effective treatment option in EF. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00441961.

Prevalence of methotrexate intolerance in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of gastrointestinal and behavioural symptoms occurring before (anticipatory/associative) and after methotrexate (MTX) administration, termed MTX intolerance, in rheumatoid (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Methotrexate Intolerance Severity Score (MISS), previously validated in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients, was used to determine MTX intolerance prevalence in 291 RA/PsA patients. The MISS consisted of four domains: abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and behavioural symptoms, occurring upon, prior to (anticipatory) and when thinking of MTX (associative). MTX intolerance was defined as ≥6 on the MISS with ≥1 point on anticipatory and/or associative and/or behavioural items. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients (42.3%) experienced at least one gastrointestinal adverse effect. The prevalence of MTX intolerance was 11%. MTX intolerance prevalence was higher in patients on parenteral (20.6%) than on oral MTX (6.2%) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Besides well-known gastrointestinal symptoms after MTX, RA and PsA patients experienced these symptoms also before MTX intake. RA and PsA patients on MTX should be closely monitored with the MISS for early detection of MTX intolerance, in order to intervene timely and avoid discontinuation of an effective treatment.

Appropriate infliximab infusion dosage and monitoring: results of a panel meeting of rheumatologists, dermatologists and gastroenterologists.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Infliximab is an effective treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease (both adult and paediatric), ulcerative colitis, psoriatic arthritis and plaque psoriasis and national and international guidelines have been developed for each indication. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This study is the first study which compared current international, national and local guidelines from the medical specialties involved in the treatment with infliximab on the following topics: indication, dosage, synergy and monitoring of vital signs. AIMS: Infliximab, an anti-TNF biologic agent, is currently indicated and reimbursed for rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease (both adult and paediatric), ulcerative colitis, psoriatic arthritis and plaque psoriasis. Development of national and international guidelines for rheumatology, gastroenterology and dermatology, was mostly based on clinical studies and expert opinion. The aim of this study was to compare available guidelines and local protocols for rheumatology, dermatology and gastroenterology, regarding dosage of infliximab, synergy of infliximab with concomitant medication and monitoring of vital signs during infliximab administration, for achieving optimal care. METHODS: Current international, national and local guidelines on the use of infliximab were reviewed and compared, differences and shortcomings were identified, and optimal treatment schedules discussed during a meeting (July 2008) of clinical experts and researchers from three departments of a Dutch university hospital. RESULTS: Recommended dosages of infliximab are not equal for different indications. Loss of response to infliximab is a common problem encountered within the three medical specialties, but indications for adjustments in treatment schedules are lacking in all of the guidelines. Monitoring of vital signs (blood pressure, pulse, temperature) during infusion with infliximab is common practice and recommended by some guidelines. Routine measurement of vital signs is not of any value in predicting or recognizing acute infusion reactions, in our experience, and this is confirmed by literature on inflammatory bowel disease. CONCLUSION: Different indications encompass different dosing schedules. National and internal guidelines do not provide advice regarding loss of response. Routine measurement of vital signs during infusion is not valuable in detecting acute infusion reactions and should only be performed in case of an acute infusion reaction. These topics need to be studied in future studies and covered in future guidelines.

Experimental stress in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a review of psychophysiological stress responses.

INTRODUCTION: Stressful events are thought to contribute to the aetiology, maintenance and exacerbation of rheumatic diseases. Given the growing interest in acute stress responses and disease, this review investigates the impact of real-life experimental psychosocial, cognitive, exercise and sensory stressors on autonomic, neuroendocrine and immune function in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. METHODS: Databases Medline, PsychINFO, Embase, Cinahl and Pubmed were screened for studies (1985 to 2009) investigating physiological stress responses in inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Results suggest that immune function may be altered in response to a stressor; such alterations could contribute to the maintenance or exacerbation of inflammatory rheumatic diseases during stressful events in daily life. CONCLUSIONS: This review emphasizes the need for more experimental research in rheumatic populations with controlled stress paradigms that include a follow-up with multiple evaluation points, simultaneous assessment of different physiological stress systems, and studying factors contributing to specific physiological responses, such as stress appraisal.

How to improve DAS28 use in daily clinical practice?--a pilot study of a nurse-led intervention.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether DAS28 measurements by a specialized nurse, before the rheumatologist visit, in combination with the advice to rheumatologists to reach a DAS28 < or = 3.2, had beneficial effects on disease activity and medication prescription in patients with RA and to explore possible predictors for variation in medication changes and reasons for non-adherence to the advice to reach a DAS28 < or = 3.2. METHODS: In this pilot study, rheumatologists were randomized to 'usual care' (n = 3) or DAS28 measurement by a nurse prior the rheumatologist visit (n = 4). In the usual care group, the DAS28 was measured but not provided to rheumatologists. Mixed model analyses were used for analysing between-group differences and for the prediction model. Rheumatologists in the intervention group were asked to provide reasons in cases of non-adherence to the advice. RESULTS: After 18 months, DAS28 was reduced by - 0.69 and - 0.66 (P = 0.70) in, respectively, the intervention (144 patients) and the usual care (104 patients) groups. In the intervention group, medication was changed by rheumatologists in 35% of the visits with a DAS28 > 3.2; in the usual care group this was 33% (P = 0.99). Baseline DAS28 (OR 1.6; P< or =0.0001) and HAQ (OR 1.3; P = 0.03) were positively related to a medication change. The most frequently mentioned reason not to change medication was patient refusal (26%). CONCLUSIONS: DAS28 measurement by a nurse was as effective as usual care; however, this intervention without protocolized treatment adjustments is not sufficient to lead to a considerable reduction in disease activity compared with trials with protocolized treatment adjustments.

HMOX1 promoter polymorphism modulates the relationship between disease activity and joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The guanine-thymidine (GT)n repeat in the HMOX1 promoter determines the level of induction of the heme-degrading enzyme heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1), which protects against inflammatory and oxidative stress. In individuals with short (GT)n repeats (where n < 25; SS genotype), higher levels of HO-1 activity are induced more rapidly than in those with long (GT)n repeats (where n > or = 25; LL genotype). Recently, it was demonstrated that HO-1 activity protects against the onset of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to determine whether the (GT)n-repeat length within the HMOX1 promoter region is associated with RA disease severity and radiographic joint damage. METHODS: A cohort of 325 well-characterized RA patients and 273 controls was investigated by DNA fragment-length analysis for the association of (GT)n repeats in the HMOX1 promoter region with RA disease susceptibility and severity. RESULTS: Although no significant differences in genotype or allele frequency were found between controls and RA patients, the odds ratios corresponded well to those in the previously described cohort. Among patients, those carrying the SS genotype had a more favorable radiographic outcome over 9 years than those carrying the LL genotype. This was unexpected since no differences in disease activity were found between the genotypes or alleles. CONCLUSION: Patients with the SS genotype have a better long-term radiographic outcome despite poor prognostic markers at baseline and despite disease activity at followup similar to that of patients with the LL genotype. This suggests that the HMOX1/HO-1 system is involved in the uncoupling of disease activity and joint damage and may provide a novel target for the treatment of RA.

Etanercept-related extensive pulmonary nodulosis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Although nodulosis is a common extraarticular manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis, accelerated pulmonary nodulosis is a rare event. The etiology of rheumatoid nodules is still unknown. Nodulosis is not necessarily associated with active joint inflammation, suggesting different pathogenic mechanisms for nodule formation and synovial tissue inflammation. We describe a patient with extensive pulmonary nodulosis, probably related to etanercept treatment. Our case emphasizes the need for careful monitoring for adverse events during treatment with biologicals, especially since the differential diagnosis often includes a broad spectrum of diseases.

Risk factors for surgical site infections and other complications in elective surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with special attention for anti-tumor necrosis factor: a large retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with special attention for anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment. METHODS: All patients with RA who had undergone elective orthopedic surgery since introduction of anti-TNF were included in a retrospective parallel-cohort study with a one-year followup. Primary endpoint was a SSI according to the 1992 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria and/or antibiotic use. Cohort 1 did not use anti-TNF, cohort 2 used anti-TNF but had either stopped (2A) or continued anti-TNF preoperatively (2B), the cutoff point being set at 4 times the half-life time of the drug. Infection rates were compared between cohorts, and logistic regression analysis was performed to examine risk factors. RESULTS: In total, 1219 (768 patients) procedures were included, and crude infection risks were 4.0% (41/1023), 5.8% (6/104), and 8.7% (8/92) in cohorts 1, 2A, and 2B, respectively. Elbow surgery (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.6-10.1), foot/ankle surgery (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.6-6.5), and prior skin or wound infection (OR 13.8, 95% CI 5.2-36.7) were associated with increased risk of SSI, whereas duration of surgery (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.23-0.78) and sulfasalazine use (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.89) were associated with decreased risk. Perioperative use of anti-TNF was not significantly associated with an increase in SSI rates (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.43-5.2). CONCLUSION: The most important risk factor for SSI is history of SSI or skin infection. Although our study was not powered to detect small differences in infection rates, perioperative continuation of anti-TNF does not seem to be an important risk factor for SSI.

Dermatological conditions during TNF-alpha-blocking therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective study.

Various dermatological conditions have been reported during tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha-blocking therapy, but until now no prospective studies have been focused on this aspect. The present study was set up to investigate the number and nature of clinically important dermatological conditions during TNF-alpha-blocking therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RA patients starting on TNF-alpha-blocking therapy were prospectively followed up. The numbers and natures of dermatological events giving rise to a dermatological consultation were recorded. The patients with a dermatological event were compared with a group of prospectively followed up RA control patients, naive to TNF-alpha-blocking therapy and matched for follow-up period. 289 RA patients started TNF-alpha-blocking therapy. 128 dermatological events were recorded in 72 patients (25%) during 911 patient-years of follow-up. TNF-alpha-blocking therapy was stopped in 19 (26%) of these 72 patients because of the dermatological event. More of the RA patients given TNF-alpha-blocking therapy (25%) than of the anti-TNF-alpha-naive patients (13%) visited a dermatologist during follow-up (P < 0.0005). Events were recorded more often during active treatment (0.16 events per patient-year) than during the period of withdrawal of TNF-alpha-blocking therapy (0.09 events per patient-year, P < 0.0005). The events recorded most frequently were skin infections (n = 33), eczema (n = 20), and drug-related eruptions (n = 15). Other events with a possible relation to TNF-alpha-blocking therapy included vasculitis, psoriasis, drug-induced systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, and a lymphomatoid-papulosis-like eruption. This study is the first large prospective study focusing on dermatological conditions during TNF-alpha-blocking therapy. It shows that dermatological conditions are a significant and clinically important problem in RA patients receiving TNF-alpha-blocking therapy.